The Inspector of Police vs Rajkumar — 27/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,384,386,364,341,34. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNKP060010262020

Filing Number

737/2020

Filing Date

19-Mar-2020

Registration No

27/2020

Registration Date

20-Mar-2020

Court

Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram

Judge

2-Additional District Judge

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

252

Police Station

SRIPRUMBUDUR POLICE STATION

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302,384,386,364,341,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajkumar

  2. 2.Venkatesan

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  3. 22-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  5. 24-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  6. 17-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  7. 22-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  8. 11-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  9. 19-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  10. 17-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  11. 28-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  12. 14-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  13. 07-Mar-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: SC 27/2020 Outcome: No re-examination (cross-examination denied). The court rejected the petitioner's request for a re-examination of witness Pw4 (Poopath), finding the witness testimony credible and admissible. Key Facts: This appears to be a criminal case involving allegations against respondents Rajkumar and Venkatesan related to a death incident in April 2019. Witness Poopath testified regarding circumstances surrounding Selvan's death, alleged extortion, and threats made by the accused. The prosecution sought to call the witness for examination; the defense objected and requested re-examination, which was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 07-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  15. 21-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  16. 07-Feb-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  17. 07-Feb-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  18. 07-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional District Judge

  19. 23-Jan-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  20. 23-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  21. 03-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  22. 12-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  23. 05-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  24. 21-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  25. 04-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  26. 12-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  27. 02-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  28. 25-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  29. 03-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  30. 04-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  31. 23-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  32. 07-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  33. 19-Sep-2023

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  34. 18-Sep-2023

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  35. 08-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  36. 03-Jul-2023

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  37. 17-Apr-2023

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  38. 24-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  39. 20-Dec-2022

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  40. 08-Nov-2022

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  41. 19-Sep-2022

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  42. 14-Jul-2022

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  43. 28-Apr-2022

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  44. 21-Mar-2022

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  45. 28-Feb-2022

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  46. 02-Feb-2022

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  47. 23-Dec-2021

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  48. 24-Nov-2021

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  49. 22-Oct-2021

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  50. 23-Sep-2021

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  51. 01-Sep-2021

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  52. 09-Aug-2021

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  53. 16-Jul-2021

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  54. 16-Jun-2021

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  55. 27-Apr-2021

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge

  56. 23-Mar-2021

    Framing of Charges

    Principal District Judge

  57. 23-Feb-2021

    Framing of Charges

    Principal District Judge

  58. 16-Feb-2021

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  59. 18-Jan-2021

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  60. 12-Jan-2021

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  61. 10-Nov-2020

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  62. 15-Sep-2020

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  63. 04-Aug-2020

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  64. 16-Jun-2020

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  65. 28-Apr-2020

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  66. 07-Apr-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 19-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SC 27/2020 Outcome: No re-examination (cross-examination denied). The court rejected the petitioner's request for a re-examination of witness Pw4 (Poopath), finding the witness testimony credible and admissible. Key Facts: This appears to be a criminal case involving allegations against respondents Rajkumar and Venkatesan related to a death incident in April 2019. Witness Poopath testified regarding circumstances surrounding Selvan's death, alleged extortion, and threats made by the accused. The prosecution sought to call the witness for examination; the defense objected and requested re-examination, which was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case