Kamal vs The Inspector of Police,Uthiramerur Police Station,Kanchipuram District. Advocate - E L KANNAN — 528/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),118(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKP060008842026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
650/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
528/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
UTHIRAMERUR POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kamal
Adv. Sathiya Subramani
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of Police,Uthiramerur Police Station,Kanchipuram District. Advocate - E L KANNAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 528/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Kamal, a 34-year-old accused facing charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(2), and 351(3), based on the absence of injuries, lack of prior criminal antecedents, and a co-accused's earlier bail grant. The court ordered his release on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, conditioned on daily police appearance, non-tampering with evidence, and non-absconding during investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 528/2026
Case Summary: 528/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Kamal, a 34-year-old accused facing charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(2), and 351(3), based on the absence of injuries, lack of prior criminal antecedents, and a co-accused's earlier bail grant. The court ordered his release on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, conditioned on daily police appearance, non-tampering with evidence, and non-absconding during investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts