State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL vs Sivasangu @ Siva sankar — 907/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,457. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180074442022
Filing Number
7444/2022
Filing Date
27-Aug-2022
Registration No
907/2022
Registration Date
01-Sep-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
379
Police Station
ERAINEL P.S
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sivasangu @ Siva sankar
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-May-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Oct-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Sep-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Aug-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jul-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jun-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jun-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2024
EvidenceView PDF
Summary This document contains witness depositions in Criminal Case No. 907/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel (dated 22.04.2024). The first witness (PW1) testified about a theft of a motor and wire from his company premises on 03.08.2022, while the second witness (PW2) provided testimony regarding police procedures. Both witnesses were cross-examined, and their statements were recorded and confirmed as accurate by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Dec-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jun-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-May-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Oct-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2022
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 907/2022
Summary This document contains witness depositions in Criminal Case No. 907/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel (dated 22.04.2024). The first witness (PW1) testified about a theft of a motor and wire from his company premises on 03.08.2022, while the second witness (PW2) provided testimony regarding police procedures. Both witnesses were cross-examined, and their statements were recorded and confirmed as accurate by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts