State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL vs Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan — 442/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,457. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180059822022
Filing Number
5982/2022
Filing Date
30-07-2022
Registration No
442/2022
Registration Date
30-07-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
ERAINEL P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan
Jothi @ Karthick
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Siva
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Karthick
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Questioning
Questioning
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 18-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 16-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Eraniel acquitted all four accused persons of theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Although a theft of brass items worth ₹19,300 from a temple was established, the court determined that the prosecution provided no credible evidence linking the accused to the crime, with witness testimonies being unreliable and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Eraniel acquitted all four accused persons of theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Although a theft of brass items worth ₹19,300 from a temple was established, the court determined that the prosecution provided no credible evidence linking the accused to the crime, with witness testimonies being unreliable and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts