State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL vs Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan — 442/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,457. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKK180059822022

Filing Number

5982/2022

Filing Date

30-Jul-2022

Registration No

442/2022

Registration Date

30-Jul-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

6

Police Station

ERAINEL P.S

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 380,457

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan

  2. 2.Jothi @ Karthick

    Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam

  3. 3.Siva

    Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam

  4. 4.Karthick

    Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Eraniel acquitted all four accused persons of theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Although a theft of brass items worth ₹19,300 from a temple was established, the court determined that the prosecution provided no credible evidence linking the accused to the crime, with witness testimonies being unreliable and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 03-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 02-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 18-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 11-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  16. 11-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 02-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  18. 02-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 12-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 18-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 19-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 05-Jun-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 04-Apr-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 13-Mar-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 20-Dec-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 29-Nov-2024

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 21-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 12-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 08-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 30-May-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 04-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 22-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 21-Dec-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 18-Oct-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 27-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 03-Jun-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 15-May-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  38. 08-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  39. 19-Dec-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  40. 26-Sep-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  41. 12-Sep-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  42. 05-Sep-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  43. 22-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  44. 08-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  45. 04-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  46. 01-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  47. 30-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 30-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 442/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Eraniel acquitted all four accused persons of theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Although a theft of brass items worth ₹19,300 from a temple was established, the court determined that the prosecution provided no credible evidence linking the accused to the crime, with witness testimonies being unreliable and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case