State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL vs Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan — 396/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,457. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180055412022
Filing Number
5541/2022
Filing Date
21-07-2022
Registration No
396/2022
Registration Date
28-07-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
497
Police Station
ERAINEL P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan
Joth @ Karthick
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Siva
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Karthick
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Questioning
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 13-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 09-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all four accused persons in a theft case (CC No. 396/2022) on March 18, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380 beyond reasonable doubt. Although the court acknowledged that a theft incident occurred on August 15, 2021, involving jewelry and cash, it determined that the government witnesses' testimony—particularly the conflicting statement of the confessional witness—was insufficient and unreliable to establish the accused's guilt with certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all four accused persons in a theft case (CC No. 396/2022) on March 18, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380 beyond reasonable doubt. Although the court acknowledged that a theft incident occurred on August 15, 2021, involving jewelry and cash, it determined that the government witnesses' testimony—particularly the conflicting statement of the confessional witness—was insufficient and unreliable to establish the accused's guilt with certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts