State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL vs Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan — 401/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,457. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180054892022
Filing Number
5489/2022
Filing Date
21-07-2022
Registration No
401/2022
Registration Date
28-07-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
485
Police Station
ERAINEL P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan
Jothi @ Karthick
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Siva
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Karthick
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Questioning
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 13-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 09-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all four accused persons of theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole decorative lamps and vessels from a temple on July 19, 2021, as the key witness testimony (confessional statement) was contradicted by other evidence and lacked corroboration by independent witnesses to prove the accused's involvement in the theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all four accused persons of theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole decorative lamps and vessels from a temple on July 19, 2021, as the key witness testimony (confessional statement) was contradicted by other evidence and lacked corroboration by independent witnesses to prove the accused's involvement in the theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts