State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL vs Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan — 401/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,457. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180054892022
Filing Number
5489/2022
Filing Date
21-Jul-2022
Registration No
401/2022
Registration Date
28-Jul-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
485
Police Station
ERAINEL P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan
-
2.Jothi @ Karthick
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
-
3.Siva
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
-
4.Karthick
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all four accused persons of theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole decorative lamps and vessels from a temple on July 19, 2021, as the key witness testimony (confessional statement) was contradicted by other evidence and lacked corroboration by independent witnesses to prove the accused's involvement in the theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Aug-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jun-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2024
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Nov-2024
Copies
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-May-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Feb-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Dec-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jun-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-May-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Mar-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Dec-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Aug-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Aug-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 401/2022
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all four accused persons of theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole decorative lamps and vessels from a temple on July 19, 2021, as the key witness testimony (confessional statement) was contradicted by other evidence and lacked corroboration by independent witnesses to prove the accused's involvement in the theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts