State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL vs Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan — 430/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,457. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180054872022
Filing Number
5487/2022
Filing Date
21-07-2022
Registration No
430/2022
Registration Date
29-07-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
124
Police Station
ERAINEL P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan
Jothi @ Karthick
Siva
Karthick
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Questioning
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 13-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 09-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all four accused persons (Aneesh Rajan, Jothi, Shiva, and Karthik) in a theft case involving gold ornaments and silver lamps from a temple. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380 beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence and witness testimonies were insufficient and contradictory to establish the accused's involvement in the alleged theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all four accused persons (Aneesh Rajan, Jothi, Shiva, and Karthik) in a theft case involving gold ornaments and silver lamps from a temple. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380 beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence and witness testimonies were insufficient and contradictory to establish the accused's involvement in the alleged theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts