State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KARUNGAL P.S vs Karthik Enta Jothi Advocate - Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam — 453/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,457,380 IPC. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKK180053172022

Part Heard

Next Hearing

25th May 2026

Filing Number

5317/2022

Filing Date

18-07-2022

Registration No

453/2022

Registration Date

03-08-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

FIR Details

FIR Number

383

Police Station

KARUNGAL P.S

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 454,457,380 IPC
MP/2/2025 Classification : Advance petition Section State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KARUNGAL P.SVenkadesh
MP/3/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KARUNGAL P.SVenkadesh
MP/4/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KARUNGAL P.SKarthik Enta Jothi

Petitioner(s)

State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KARUNGAL P.S

Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Karthik Enta Jothi Advocate - Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam

Venkadesh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate

20-04-2026

Part Heard

06-04-2026

Part Heard

30-03-2026

Part Heard

25-03-2026

Part Heard

23-03-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

11-02-2026
Evidence

In Criminal Case No. 453/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel, witness depositions were recorded on 11.02.2026. Two witnesses (PW.1 and PW.2) testified, both denying knowledge of the accused and claiming the confessional statement signatures were not theirs. The court permitted cross-examination under Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and the testimonies were recorded and accepted by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Case No. 453/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel, witness depositions were recorded on 11.02.2026. Two witnesses (PW.1 and PW.2) testified, both denying knowledge of the accused and claiming the confessional statement signatures were not theirs. The court permitted cross-examination under Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and the testimonies were recorded and accepted by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case