State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL vs Sivasangar Advocate - Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam — 276/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 28th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKK180039962022

Case disposed

Filing Number

3996/2022

Filing Date

16-06-2022

Registration No

276/2022

Registration Date

12-07-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

ERAINEL P.S

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 457,380
MP/1/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section SivasangarState Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL
MP/2/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINELLaser
MP/3/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINELLaser
MP/4/2026 Classification : Advance petition Section SivasangarState Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL
MP/5/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section SivasangarState Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL
MP/6/2026 Classification : 311 Cr.PC Section State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL

Petitioner(s)

State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,ERAINEL

Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Sivasangar Advocate - Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam

Laser

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate

28-04-2026

Disposed

27-04-2026

Questioning

06-04-2026

Part Heard

30-03-2026

Trial

25-03-2026

Trial

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Eraniel acquitted two accused persons (Sivaswamy and Ponaraiyan) of theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while a theft incident was established, the circumstantial evidence—including a confession statement from one accused that contradicted prosecution claims—was insufficient to conclusively link the defendants to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

06-04-2026
Evidence
27-04-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Eraniel acquitted two accused persons (Sivaswamy and Ponaraiyan) of theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while a theft incident was established, the circumstantial evidence—including a confession statement from one accused that contradicted prosecution claims—was insufficient to conclusively link the defendants to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case