State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police ERAINEL P.S vs Ajay — 1123/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),296(b),115(2),351(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNKK180039642025

e-Filing Number

08-12-2025

Filing Number

3905/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

1123/2025

Registration Date

08-Dec-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

448

Police Station

ERAINEL P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),296(b),115(2),351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police ERAINEL P.S

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ajay

  2. 2.Sreejith

  3. 3.Ragul Sanjay

  4. 4.Sabarish

  5. 5.Murugesan

  6. 6.Ramji

  7. 7.Sriram

  8. 8.Akash

  9. 9.Ratheesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all nine accused persons of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 191(2), 296(b), and 351(2) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the key complainant (witness PW1) contradicted the government's case by testifying that he had settled the matter with the accused, and no corroborating evidence was presented to substantiate the charges of criminal intimidation and wrongful restraint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1123/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all nine accused persons of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 191(2), 296(b), and 351(2) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the key complainant (witness PW1) contradicted the government's case by testifying that he had settled the matter with the accused, and no corroborating evidence was presented to substantiate the charges of criminal intimidation and wrongful restraint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case