State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,MANAVALAKURICHY vs Paramesh and 3 others(Absconding) — 204/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 21st April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180038312022
Filing Number
3831/2022
Filing Date
09-Jun-2022
Registration No
204/2022
Registration Date
09-Jun-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
128
Police Station
MANAVALAKURICHY P.S
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,MANAVALAKURICHY
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Paramesh and 3 others(Absconding)
-
2.venkadesh
-
3.Ayyappan(Absconding)
-
4.Manikandan(Absconding)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel acquitted all four accused persons of theft charges under IPC Section 379, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the court acknowledged that a theft incident occurred at the company premises, it determined that the prosecution's evidence—relying primarily on confessional statements and witness testimonies—was insufficient to establish the accused's involvement, as key evidence lacked corroboration and the confessions contained contradictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2025
Admission
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2025
Admission
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Oct-2025
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-May-2025
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Mar-2025
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Dec-2024
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2024
Copies
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Oct-2024
Copies
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jul-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Mar-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Nov-2023
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Sep-2023
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Aug-2023
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jun-2023
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Apr-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Feb-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Nov-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Aug-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 204/2022
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel acquitted all four accused persons of theft charges under IPC Section 379, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the court acknowledged that a theft incident occurred at the company premises, it determined that the prosecution's evidence—relying primarily on confessional statements and witness testimonies—was insufficient to establish the accused's involvement, as key evidence lacked corroboration and the confessions contained contradictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts