State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,MANAVALAKURICHY vs Paramesh and 3 others(Absconding) — 204/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 21st April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180038312022
Filing Number
3831/2022
Filing Date
09-06-2022
Registration No
204/2022
Registration Date
09-06-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
128
Police Station
MANAVALAKURICHY P.S
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,MANAVALAKURICHY
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Paramesh and 3 others(Absconding)
venkadesh
Ayyappan(Absconding)
Manikandan(Absconding)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Questioning
Part Heard
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | Questioning |
| 06-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 30-03-2026 | Trial |
| 25-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel acquitted all four accused persons of theft charges under IPC Section 379, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the court acknowledged that a theft incident occurred at the company premises, it determined that the prosecution's evidence—relying primarily on confessional statements and witness testimonies—was insufficient to establish the accused's involvement, as key evidence lacked corroboration and the confessions contained contradictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel acquitted all four accused persons of theft charges under IPC Section 379, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the court acknowledged that a theft incident occurred at the company premises, it determined that the prosecution's evidence—relying primarily on confessional statements and witness testimonies—was insufficient to establish the accused's involvement, as key evidence lacked corroboration and the confessions contained contradictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts