State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,MANAVALAKURICHY vs Anish Rajan @ Anish Advocate - Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam — 203/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,454,457. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180038262022
Filing Number
3826/2022
Filing Date
09-Jun-2022
Registration No
203/2022
Registration Date
09-Jun-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
119
Police Station
MANAVALAKURICHY P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,MANAVALAKURICHY
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anish Rajan @ Anish Advocate - Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
-
2.Jothi(Karthick)
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
-
3.Siva
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
-
4.Karthick @ Chinna Karthick
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Eraniel acquitted all four accused persons of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 457 and 380 (theft-related offences) on March 16, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the confessional statement given by one accused was contradicted by other witness testimonies and lacked sufficient corroborating evidence to establish the accused's involvement in the alleged theft of gold ornaments from a temple. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Sep-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Sep-2025
Compromise
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Aug-2025
Compromise
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Aug-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jun-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2024
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Nov-2024
Copies
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-May-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Feb-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Dec-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jun-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-May-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Mar-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Dec-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Aug-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jul-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jul-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jun-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jun-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 203/2022
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Eraniel acquitted all four accused persons of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 457 and 380 (theft-related offences) on March 16, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the confessional statement given by one accused was contradicted by other witness testimonies and lacked sufficient corroborating evidence to establish the accused's involvement in the alleged theft of gold ornaments from a temple. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts