State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of PoliceCholachel vs Suresh — 319/2013
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,341,294(b),324,506(ii). Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180029472019
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
319/2013
Filing Date
20-09-2013
Registration No
319/2013
Registration Date
20-09-2013
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
295
Police Station
COLACHEL P.S
Year
2009
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of PoliceCholachel
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Suresh
Subash
Saravanan
Sathesh
Prasath
Suresh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 25-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 04-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is a witness deposition document (C.C.No. 319/2013) from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel, recorded on 03.09.2024. The witness, Dr. R.J. Praveen (an anesthesiologist), testified regarding injuries sustained by a complainant on 16.11.2009, documenting six injuries including contusions, lacerations, and swelling. The court allowed exemption under CrPC Section 317(1) for accused persons charged with offenses 2, 4, and 5, while accused persons charged with offenses 1 and 3 were present; cross-examination of the witness was completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness deposition document (C.C.No. 319/2013) from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel, recorded on 03.09.2024. The witness, Dr. R.J. Praveen (an anesthesiologist), testified regarding injuries sustained by a complainant on 16.11.2009, documenting six injuries including contusions, lacerations, and swelling. The court allowed exemption under CrPC Section 317(1) for accused persons charged with offenses 2, 4, and 5, while accused persons charged with offenses 1 and 3 were present; cross-examination of the witness was completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts