State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of PoliceCOLACHEL P.S vs Magelin Raja Advocate - S. Silvester — 26/2010
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,506(ii). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180029032019
Next Hearing
27th May 2026
Filing Number
26/2010
Filing Date
19-01-2010
Registration No
26/2010
Registration Date
19-01-2010
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
142
Police Station
COLACHEL P.S
Year
2009
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of PoliceCOLACHEL P.S
Adv. APP JM ERANIEL
Respondent(s)
Magelin Raja Advocate - S. Silvester
Subash
Suresh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 18-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition of witness (P.W. 7/L.W. 11) in Criminal Case No. 26/2010 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel, recorded on 04.02.2026. The witness, a retired police officer, testified regarding an FIR (No. 142/2009) filed under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 506 following a complaint lodged on 31.05.2009 at 01:00 hours concerning injuries sustained by two individuals. The witness's examination-in-chief and cross-examination were completed, and the testimony was admitted as correct by the accused persons present in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition of witness (P.W. 7/L.W. 11) in Criminal Case No. 26/2010 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel, recorded on 04.02.2026. The witness, a retired police officer, testified regarding an FIR (No. 142/2009) filed under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 506 following a complaint lodged on 31.05.2009 at 01:00 hours concerning injuries sustained by two individuals. The witness's examination-in-chief and cross-examination were completed, and the testimony was admitted as correct by the accused persons present in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts