State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of PoliceCholachel vs Vinister Advocate - K. Murugan — 232/2013
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),325,506(i). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180028352019
Next Hearing
27th May 2026
Filing Number
232/2013
Filing Date
15-07-2013
Registration No
232/2013
Registration Date
15-07-2013
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
196
Police Station
COLACHEL P.S
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of PoliceCholachel
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Vinister Advocate - K. Murugan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 20-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 01-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition recorded via video conference on 18.02.2026 in Criminal Case No. 232/2013 before the Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. A police investigation officer (P.W. 6/L.W. 8) testified regarding a 2013 case involving charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, and 506, which was later amended to section 325. The witness's testimony was recorded through Microsoft Teams and documented by a court computer operator, with both the accused and government counsel present during the examination and cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition recorded via video conference on 18.02.2026 in Criminal Case No. 232/2013 before the Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. A police investigation officer (P.W. 6/L.W. 8) testified regarding a 2013 case involving charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, and 506, which was later amended to section 325. The witness's testimony was recorded through Microsoft Teams and documented by a court computer operator, with both the accused and government counsel present during the examination and cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts