State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Cholachel vs Siva Sangu and another — 358/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKK180027732020

Case disposed

Filing Number

2764/2020

Filing Date

07-10-2020

Registration No

358/2020

Registration Date

07-10-2020

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

141

Police Station

COLACHEL P.S

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 457,380
MP/3/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,CholachelSiva Sangu and another

Petitioner(s)

State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Cholachel

Adv. APP JM ERANIEL

Respondent(s)

Siva Sangu and another

Lasar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Judgement

03-03-2026

Questioning

02-03-2026

Part Heard

25-02-2026

Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel acquitted both accused (Sivasangu and another) on charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 457 (burglary) and 380 (theft) on March 13, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while evidence established a theft incident occurred, the prosecution could not definitively establish the accused's involvement through credible testimony and circumstantial evidence that met legal standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

01-04-2024
Evidence
10-06-2024
Evidence
24-06-2024
Evidence
03-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel acquitted both accused (Sivasangu and another) on charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 457 (burglary) and 380 (theft) on March 13, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while evidence established a theft incident occurred, the prosecution could not definitively establish the accused's involvement through credible testimony and circumstantial evidence that met legal standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case