State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,VELLICHANTHAI vs Anishrajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan — 127/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180026602022
Filing Number
2660/2022
Filing Date
29-04-2022
Registration No
127/2022
Registration Date
29-04-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
VELLICHANTHAI P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,VELLICHANTHAI
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Anishrajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan
Jothi( Karthick)
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Siva
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Karthick
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Questioning
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 09-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 03-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all four accused persons (Anish Rajan, Jothi, Shiva, and Karthik) of theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380 on March 16, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the confessional statement was unreliable and unsupported by independent corroborating evidence linking the accused to the alleged theft from a temple. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all four accused persons (Anish Rajan, Jothi, Shiva, and Karthik) of theft charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380 on March 16, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the confessional statement was unreliable and unsupported by independent corroborating evidence linking the accused to the alleged theft from a temple. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts