State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,VELLICHANTHAI vs Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan — 112/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,457 IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180024992022
Filing Number
2499/2022
Filing Date
25-04-2022
Registration No
112/2022
Registration Date
25-04-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
143
Police Station
VELLICHANTHAI P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,VELLICHANTHAI
Adv. App, JM, Eraniel
Respondent(s)
Anish Rajan Enta Anish Advocate - Adv A.Vimalan
Jothi @ Karthick
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Siva
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Karthick
Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 09-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all four accused persons (Anish Rajan, Jothi, Shiva, and Karthik) on March 17, 2026, of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 457 (burglary) and 380 (theft) for allegedly stealing two white decorative lamps from a police station compound on August 12, 2021. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing insufficient corroborating evidence, contradictory witness statements, and lack of credible forensic or circumstantial evidence linking the accused to the alleged theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ernakulam acquitted all four accused persons (Anish Rajan, Jothi, Shiva, and Karthik) on March 17, 2026, of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 457 (burglary) and 380 (theft) for allegedly stealing two white decorative lamps from a police station compound on August 12, 2021. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing insufficient corroborating evidence, contradictory witness statements, and lack of credible forensic or circumstantial evidence linking the accused to the alleged theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts