State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Cholachel vs Sivasangu @ Sivasankar — 238/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457, 380. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180023272020
Filing Number
2319/2020
Filing Date
03-09-2020
Registration No
238/2020
Registration Date
03-09-2020
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
COLACHEL P.S
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Cholachel
Adv. APP JM ERANIEL
Respondent(s)
Sivasangu @ Sivasankar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 03-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 02-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel acquitted both accused persons (Sivasangu and another) of charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380 (theft), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while a theft incident occurred, the government's evidence—including contradictory witness testimonies and an inadmissible confessional statement—was insufficient to establish that the accused committed the crime. Consequently, the accused were discharged from all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel acquitted both accused persons (Sivasangu and another) of charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380 (theft), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while a theft incident occurred, the government's evidence—including contradictory witness testimonies and an inadmissible confessional statement—was insufficient to establish that the accused committed the crime. Consequently, the accused were discharged from all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts