State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Cholachel vs Sivasangu @ Sivasankar — 238/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457, 380. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180023272020
Filing Number
2319/2020
Filing Date
03-Sep-2020
Registration No
238/2020
Registration Date
03-Sep-2020
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
COLACHEL P.S
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Cholachel
Adv. APP JM ERANIEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sivasangu @ Sivasankar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel acquitted both accused persons (Sivasangu and another) of charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380 (theft), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while a theft incident occurred, the government's evidence—including contradictory witness testimonies and an inadmissible confessional statement—was insufficient to establish that the accused committed the crime. Consequently, the accused were discharged from all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-May-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Oct-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Sep-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Aug-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jul-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jun-2024
EvidenceView PDF
-
24-Jun-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jun-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2024
EvidenceView PDF
-
10-Jun-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Dec-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jun-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-May-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Oct-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Aug-2022
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jun-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jan-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Nov-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Oct-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Aug-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jun-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Apr-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Feb-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2020
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Sep-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 238/2020
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel acquitted both accused persons (Sivasangu and another) of charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380 (theft), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while a theft incident occurred, the government's evidence—including contradictory witness testimonies and an inadmissible confessional statement—was insufficient to establish that the accused committed the crime. Consequently, the accused were discharged from all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts