State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police,COLACHEL P.S vs Siva Advocate - Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam — 199/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380 IPC. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKK180022042021

Part Heard

Next Hearing

25th May 2026

Filing Number

2198/2021

Filing Date

19-07-2021

Registration No

199/2021

Registration Date

19-07-2021

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

FIR Details

FIR Number

171

Police Station

COLACHEL P.S

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 457,380 IPC
MP/1/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police,COLACHEL P.SKarthik @ Jothi

Petitioner(s)

State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police,COLACHEL P.S

Adv. APP, JM Eraniel

Respondent(s)

Siva Advocate - Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam

Karthik @ Jothi

Adv. Adv. Y. Nalany Chellam

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate

20-04-2026

Part Heard

06-04-2026

Part Heard

30-03-2026

Part Heard

25-03-2026

Part Heard

23-03-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

11-02-2026
Evidence

Case Summary Case No.: C.C. No. 199/2021 | Court: Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel Outcome: Witness depositions recorded on 11.02.2026. Two witnesses (P.W.1 and P.W.2) testified that they do not recognize the accused, their signatures on the confessional statement are forged, and police never interrogated them. The court permitted cross-examination under Indian Evidence Act Section 154 due to material contradictions with prosecution evidence. The testimonies were recorded and accepted by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: C.C. No. 199/2021 | Court: Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel Outcome: Witness depositions recorded on 11.02.2026. Two witnesses (P.W.1 and P.W.2) testified that they do not recognize the accused, their signatures on the confessional statement are forged, and police never interrogated them. The court permitted cross-examination under Indian Evidence Act Section 154 due to material contradictions with prosecution evidence. The testimonies were recorded and accepted by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case