State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police,COLACHEL P.S vs Karthick Enta Jothi(Absconding) — 179/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180021712021
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
Filing Number
2165/2021
Filing Date
13-07-2021
Registration No
179/2021
Registration Date
13-07-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
223
Police Station
COLACHEL P.S
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police,COLACHEL P.S
Adv. APP, JM Eraniel
Respondent(s)
Karthick Enta Jothi(Absconding)
Venkatesh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 06-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 30-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 23-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In Criminal Case No. 179/2021 at the Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel, witness depositions (P.W. 1 and P.W. 2) were recorded on 11.02.2026. Both witnesses (Santhosh Kumar and Sujin) testified that they did not know the accused, denied the signatures on a confessional statement attributed to them, and claimed police did not interrogate them. The court permitted cross-examination under Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and the witness statements were transcribed and confirmed by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In Criminal Case No. 179/2021 at the Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel, witness depositions (P.W. 1 and P.W. 2) were recorded on 11.02.2026. Both witnesses (Santhosh Kumar and Sujin) testified that they did not know the accused, denied the signatures on a confessional statement attributed to them, and claimed police did not interrogate them. The court permitted cross-examination under Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and the witness statements were transcribed and confirmed by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts