State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,MONDAIKADU vs Paramesh — 89/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKK180012522020

Filing Number

1250/2020

Filing Date

20-Feb-2020

Registration No

89/2020

Registration Date

22-Feb-2020

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

33

Police Station

MONDAIKADU P.S

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,411,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,MONDAIKADU

    Adv. APP JM ERANIEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Paramesh

  2. 2.Vengadesh

  3. 3.Ayyappan

  4. 4.Mani Kandan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Eraniel acquitted all four accused persons in this theft case (CC No. 89/2020) dated April 7, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole a sandalwood tree worth ₹3,000 from a temple or that the fourth accused knowingly purchased stolen wood, as the critical witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked credible corroboration. Applying the doctrine of reasonable doubt under Indian criminal law, the court ruled the prosecution had not discharged its burden of proof and acquitted all defendants under IPC Sections 379/34 and 411. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 09-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 03-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 02-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 25-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 18-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 11-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 02-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 12-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 28-Nov-2025

    Admission

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 26-Nov-2025

    Admission

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 14-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 11-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 20-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 18-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 28-Dec-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 09-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 30-Oct-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 12-Oct-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 24-Aug-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 22-Jun-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 24-Apr-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 13-Apr-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 06-Feb-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 12-Dec-2022

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 01-Dec-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 22-Sep-2022

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  38. 08-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  39. 23-Jun-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  40. 13-May-2022

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  41. 21-Mar-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  42. 24-Feb-2022

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  43. 04-Jan-2022

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  44. 31-Dec-2021

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  45. 18-Oct-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  46. 28-Jul-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  47. 18-May-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  48. 19-Feb-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  49. 09-Dec-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  50. 28-Sep-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  51. 27-Jul-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  52. 28-May-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  53. 23-Mar-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  54. 22-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 20-Feb-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Eraniel acquitted all four accused persons in this theft case (CC No. 89/2020) dated April 7, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole a sandalwood tree worth ₹3,000 from a temple or that the fourth accused knowingly purchased stolen wood, as the critical witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked credible corroboration. Applying the doctrine of reasonable doubt under Indian criminal law, the court ruled the prosecution had not discharged its burden of proof and acquitted all defendants under IPC Sections 379/34 and 411. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case