Preejith vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KARUNGAL P.S — 195/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK180005082026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

506/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

195/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

77

Police Station

KARUNGAL P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Preejith

    Adv. Satheesh kumar P

  2. 2.Dinesh

    Adv. Satheesh kumar P

  3. 3.Sakthivel

    Adv. Satheesh kumar P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KARUNGAL P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel rejected the bail petition (Section 480 CrPC) filed by three accused persons charged under IPC Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting and threatening a person on 07.03.2026. The court dismissed the petition citing substantial prima facie evidence against the accused, the victim's ongoing medical treatment, risk of witness intimidation, and flight risk, finding no grounds for bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 195/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel rejected the bail petition (Section 480 CrPC) filed by three accused persons charged under IPC Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting and threatening a person on 07.03.2026. The court dismissed the petition citing substantial prima facie evidence against the accused, the victim's ongoing medical treatment, risk of witness intimidation, and flight risk, finding no grounds for bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case