Nirmalarani C vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KARUNGAL P.S — 181/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK180004822026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
481/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
181/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
64
Police Station
KARUNGAL P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nirmalarani C
Adv. PON MUTHU PANDIAN K
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KARUNGAL P.S
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel, dismissed the bail petition (CrMP 181/2026) filed by the accused under Section 480 CrPC. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 316(5) and 318(4) for allegedly stealing approximately 300 grams of gold jewelry from a jewelry shop operated by the accused and his son, and the court found sufficient prima facie grounds for the charges, risks of tampering with evidence, and possibility of further crimes, making bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 181/2026
The Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel, dismissed the bail petition (CrMP 181/2026) filed by the accused under Section 480 CrPC. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 316(5) and 318(4) for allegedly stealing approximately 300 grams of gold jewelry from a jewelry shop operated by the accused and his son, and the court found sufficient prima facie grounds for the charges, risks of tampering with evidence, and possibility of further crimes, making bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts