State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of PoliceCholachel vs Sahayamathan — 100223/2010
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,341,323,294(),325,506(i). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKK180000012019
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
Filing Number
100223/2010
Filing Date
10-12-2010
Registration No
100223/2010
Registration Date
10-12-2010
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
85
Police Station
COLACHEL P.S
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of PoliceCholachel
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Sahayamathan
Ramesh
Adv. Adv.P.John Xavier
Ratheesh
Shibu
Prabhu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Questioning
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 25-03-2026 | Questioning |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Criminal Case No. 223/2010 before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel, the deposition of witness (P.W. 11) was recorded via video conference on 18.03.2026. The witness, a police officer, testified regarding injuries inflicted on victims that were classified as "grievous hurt" under IPC Section 325, leading to charges against the accused under IPC Sections 147, 341, 325, 294(b), and 506. The cross-examination of the witness was completed and the testimony was electronically recorded and authenticated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Criminal Case No. 223/2010 before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Eraniel, the deposition of witness (P.W. 11) was recorded via video conference on 18.03.2026. The witness, a police officer, testified regarding injuries inflicted on victims that were classified as "grievous hurt" under IPC Section 325, leading to charges against the accused under IPC Sections 147, 341, 325, 294(b), and 506. The cross-examination of the witness was completed and the testimony was electronically recorded and authenticated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts