Peruvilai Kandan Sasta Temple Trustee and one another vs B. Nagan pillai and 5 others Advocate - SA. KANAGASABAPATHI — 44/2014
Status: Trial. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK170009522019
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
44/2014
Filing Date
07-04-2014
Registration No
44/2014
Registration Date
07-04-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-District Munsif
Petitioner(s)
Peruvilai Kandan Sasta Temple Trustee and one another
Adv. V. PURUSHOTHAMAN
S. Narayana Iyer,
Adv. V. PURUSHOTHAMAN
Addl.3. Mrs. Lalithambiga
Adv. V. PURUSHOTHAMAN
Addl.4. Subramanian
Adv. V. PURUSHOTHAMAN
Addl.5. Ganesh Kumar
Adv. V. PURUSHOTHAMAN
Addl.6. Girish Kumar
Adv. V. PURUSHOTHAMAN
Radhika Ravi
Adv. V. PURUSHOTHAMAN
Respondent(s)
B. Nagan pillai and 5 others Advocate - SA. KANAGASABAPATHI
P.Babu Shekar
Adv. SA. KANAGASABAPATHI
M.T. Balan
Adv. SA. KANAGASABAPATHI
S. Ramakrishnan
Adv. SA. KANAGASABAPATHI
C. Nesamony
Adv. SA. KANAGASABAPATHI
Perinba Nayagam
Adv. SA. KANAGASABAPATHI
Santhanam Pillai
Adv. John Berlamen
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Trial
Trial
Trial
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Trial |
| 24-04-2026 | Trial |
| 22-04-2026 | Trial |
| 21-04-2026 | Issues |
| 20-04-2026 | Issues |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record (PW1 - Ganesh Kumar) in Original Suit No. 44/2014 before the District Munsif Court, Eraniel, dated 26.07.2025. The witness has filed his affidavit testimony and eleven documentary exhibits (including land revenue receipts, property tax documents, court orders, and administrative records) have been marked and indexed as evidence for the plaintiff's case. The court awaits judgment based on the recorded testimony and submitted documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record (PW1 - Ganesh Kumar) in Original Suit No. 44/2014 before the District Munsif Court, Eraniel, dated 26.07.2025. The witness has filed his affidavit testimony and eleven documentary exhibits (including land revenue receipts, property tax documents, court orders, and administrative records) have been marked and indexed as evidence for the plaintiff's case. The court awaits judgment based on the recorded testimony and submitted documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts