Robert Singh vs Neelakanta Prasad Advocate - LENIN C S, C.S. LENIN — 44/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26orderVIIRule1and2ofthecodeofCivilProcedure1908. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK170008322019
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
44/2016
Filing Date
29-04-2016
Registration No
44/2016
Registration Date
29-04-2016
Court
District Munsif Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Robert Singh
Adv. JOHN BOSCO M
Respondent(s)
Neelakanta Prasad Advocate - LENIN C S, C.S. LENIN
The Special Thashildhar
Adv. Government Pleader
The Special District Revenue Officer Land Aequistition National Highways
Adv. Government Pleader
State of Tamil Nadu
Adv. Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a cross-examination (examination-in-chief) of Defense Witness 1 (DW1) Neelakantaprasad in Original Suit No. 44/2016 before the District Munsif Court, Eraniel, dated 21.04.2026. It records the witness's responses to questions regarding a 1950 partition agreement, land ownership, survey numbers, and claims for compensation related to government-acquired land. The document does not contain a final court order with a specific outcome (such as bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, or case adjournment), but rather constitutes part of the witness examination record in an ongoing civil suit. SKIP — This is witness testimony, not a final court order with a declarative outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a cross-examination (examination-in-chief) of Defense Witness 1 (DW1) Neelakantaprasad in Original Suit No. 44/2016 before the District Munsif Court, Eraniel, dated 21.04.2026. It records the witness's responses to questions regarding a 1950 partition agreement, land ownership, survey numbers, and claims for compensation related to government-acquired land. The document does not contain a final court order with a specific outcome (such as bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, or case adjournment), but rather constitutes part of the witness examination record in an ongoing civil suit. SKIP — This is witness testimony, not a final court order with a declarative outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts