Muthuswamy vs Ayyaswami and one another Advocate - K. MURUGESAN — 70/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26O7R1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 25th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK170001042022
Filing Number
118/2022
Filing Date
17-10-2022
Registration No
70/2022
Registration Date
07-12-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
25th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muthuswamy
Adv. Adv.T.Sivakumar
Respondent(s)
Ayyaswami and one another Advocate - K. MURUGESAN
S.Anitha
Adv. T. DHANAPAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 21-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 17-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-04-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: District Munsif, Eraniel Case: Original Suit No. 70/2022 Date: 23.01.2026 Decision: The court's judgment primarily consists of cross-examination statements from both defendants and the plaintiff regarding a land partition dispute. The case involves the division of a 5-cent property (Survey No. Pattikai) originally allocated to the plaintiff's father, which was subsequently subdivided among family members. The defendants (including the plaintiff's uncle and cousin) disputed the plaintiff's boundary demarcation claims and the removal of boundary stones on 15.09.2022, while the plaintiff sought boundary determination and relief based on alleged obstruction during land measurement on 10.10.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: District Munsif, Eraniel Case: Original Suit No. 70/2022 Date: 23.01.2026 Decision: The court's judgment primarily consists of cross-examination statements from both defendants and the plaintiff regarding a land partition dispute. The case involves the division of a 5-cent property (Survey No. Pattikai) originally allocated to the plaintiff's father, which was subsequently subdivided among family members. The defendants (including the plaintiff's uncle and cousin) disputed the plaintiff's boundary demarcation claims and the removal of boundary stones on 15.09.2022, while the plaintiff sought boundary determination and relief based on alleged obstruction during land measurement on 10.10.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts