Muthuswamy vs Ayyaswami and one another Advocate - K. MURUGESAN — 70/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26O7R1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 25th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKK170001042022

Filing Number

118/2022

Filing Date

17-Oct-2022

Registration No

70/2022

Registration Date

07-Dec-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-District Munsif

Decision Date

25-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muthuswamy

    Adv. Adv.T.Sivakumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ayyaswami and one another Advocate - K. MURUGESAN

  2. 2.S.Anitha

    Adv. T. DHANAPAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  12. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  13. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  14. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  15. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  16. 11-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  17. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  18. 23-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Court: District Munsif, Eraniel Case: Original Suit No. 70/2022 Date: 23.01.2026 Decision: The court's judgment primarily consists of cross-examination statements from both defendants and the plaintiff regarding a land partition dispute. The case involves the division of a 5-cent property (Survey No. Pattikai) originally allocated to the plaintiff's father, which was subsequently subdivided among family members. The defendants (including the plaintiff's uncle and cousin) disputed the plaintiff's boundary demarcation claims and the removal of boundary stones on 15.09.2022, while the plaintiff sought boundary determination and relief based on alleged obstruction during land measurement on 10.10.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  20. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  21. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  22. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  23. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  24. 10-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  25. 10-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  26. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  27. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  28. 23-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  29. 23-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  30. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  31. 24-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  32. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  33. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  34. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  35. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  36. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  37. 30-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  38. 21-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  39. 10-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  40. 10-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  41. 10-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  42. 30-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  43. 18-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  44. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  45. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  46. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  47. 21-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  48. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  49. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  50. 21-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  51. 21-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  52. 24-Jan-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  53. 13-Dec-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  54. 29-Nov-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  55. 25-Oct-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  56. 23-Aug-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  57. 12-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  58. 28-Jun-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  59. 12-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  60. 08-Mar-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  61. 04-Jan-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  62. 19-Oct-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  63. 11-Aug-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  64. 14-Jul-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  65. 09-Jun-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  66. 24-Mar-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  67. 10-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  68. 06-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  69. 07-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  70. 17-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 70/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court: District Munsif, Eraniel Case: Original Suit No. 70/2022 Date: 23.01.2026 Decision: The court's judgment primarily consists of cross-examination statements from both defendants and the plaintiff regarding a land partition dispute. The case involves the division of a 5-cent property (Survey No. Pattikai) originally allocated to the plaintiff's father, which was subsequently subdivided among family members. The defendants (including the plaintiff's uncle and cousin) disputed the plaintiff's boundary demarcation claims and the removal of boundary stones on 15.09.2022, while the plaintiff sought boundary determination and relief based on alleged obstruction during land measurement on 10.10.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case