F. Rayappan vs A. Thangappan Advocate - V. VIAGULAMUTHU — 7/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK170000072025
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
8/2025
Filing Date
03-02-2025
Registration No
7/2025
Registration Date
03-02-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
F. Rayappan
Adv. Adv.P.John Xavier
F. Deva Sahayam
Adv. Adv. V. Viyagulamuthu
F. Selvin Juliyas
Adv. Adv. V. Viyagulamuthu
F. Rosely
Adv. Adv. V. Viyagulamuthu
Respondent(s)
A. Thangappan Advocate - V. VIAGULAMUTHU
T. Vishnu
Adv. V. VIAGULAMUTHU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Original Suit No. 7/2025 & Original Suit No. 64/2021 | District Munsif, Eraniel | Date: 03.02.2026 These are cross-examination proceedings (witness statements) in property dispute cases involving alleged forged/irregular documents and boundary/easement issues. The court recorded the testimony of defendants (DW1) regarding disputed land documents, property transfers dating back 45 years, and claims of path obstruction. The order appears to be a recording of witness examination proceedings rather than a final judgment; no conclusive order (judgment/decree) has been pronounced yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Original Suit No. 7/2025 & Original Suit No. 64/2021 | District Munsif, Eraniel | Date: 03.02.2026 These are cross-examination proceedings (witness statements) in property dispute cases involving alleged forged/irregular documents and boundary/easement issues. The court recorded the testimony of defendants (DW1) regarding disputed land documents, property transfers dating back 45 years, and claims of path obstruction. The order appears to be a recording of witness examination proceedings rather than a final judgment; no conclusive order (judgment/decree) has been pronounced yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts