F. Rayappan vs A. Thangappan Advocate - V. VIAGULAMUTHU — 7/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKK170000072025

Arguments

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

8/2025

Filing Date

03-02-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

03-02-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

F. Rayappan

Adv. Adv.P.John Xavier

F. Deva Sahayam

Adv. Adv. V. Viyagulamuthu

F. Selvin Juliyas

Adv. Adv. V. Viyagulamuthu

F. Rosely

Adv. Adv. V. Viyagulamuthu

Respondent(s)

A. Thangappan Advocate - V. VIAGULAMUTHU

T. Vishnu

Adv. V. VIAGULAMUTHU

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

29-04-2026

Arguments

20-04-2026

Arguments

09-04-2026

Arguments

01-04-2026

Arguments

18-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

09-10-2025
Deposition
20-11-2025
Deposition
03-02-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Original Suit No. 7/2025 & Original Suit No. 64/2021 | District Munsif, Eraniel | Date: 03.02.2026 These are cross-examination proceedings (witness statements) in property dispute cases involving alleged forged/irregular documents and boundary/easement issues. The court recorded the testimony of defendants (DW1) regarding disputed land documents, property transfers dating back 45 years, and claims of path obstruction. The order appears to be a recording of witness examination proceedings rather than a final judgment; no conclusive order (judgment/decree) has been pronounced yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Original Suit No. 7/2025 & Original Suit No. 64/2021 | District Munsif, Eraniel | Date: 03.02.2026 These are cross-examination proceedings (witness statements) in property dispute cases involving alleged forged/irregular documents and boundary/easement issues. The court recorded the testimony of defendants (DW1) regarding disputed land documents, property transfers dating back 45 years, and claims of path obstruction. The order appears to be a recording of witness examination proceedings rather than a final judgment; no conclusive order (judgment/decree) has been pronounced yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Eraniel All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case