F. Rayappan vs A. Thangappan Advocate - V. VIAGULAMUTHU — 7/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKK170000072025

Filing Number

8/2025

Filing Date

03-Feb-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

03-Feb-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.F. Rayappan

    Adv. Adv.P.John Xavier

  2. 2.F. Deva Sahayam

    Adv. Adv. V. Viyagulamuthu

  3. 3.F. Selvin Juliyas

    Adv. Adv. V. Viyagulamuthu

  4. 4.F. Rosely

    Adv. Adv. V. Viyagulamuthu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A. Thangappan Advocate - V. VIAGULAMUTHU

  2. 2.T. Vishnu

    Adv. V. VIAGULAMUTHU

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Original Suit No. 7/2025 & Original Suit No. 64/2021 | District Munsif, Eraniel | Date: 03.02.2026 These are cross-examination proceedings (witness statements) in property dispute cases involving alleged forged/irregular documents and boundary/easement issues. The court recorded the testimony of defendants (DW1) regarding disputed land documents, property transfers dating back 45 years, and claims of path obstruction. The order appears to be a recording of witness examination proceedings rather than a final judgment; no conclusive order (judgment/decree) has been pronounced yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  14. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  15. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  16. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  17. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  18. 20-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  20. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  21. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  22. 09-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  23. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  24. 25-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  25. 08-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  26. 22-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  27. 11-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  28. 25-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  29. 10-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  30. 24-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  31. 13-Jun-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  32. 02-Jun-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  33. 01-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  34. 03-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  35. 03-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 03-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Original Suit No. 7/2025 & Original Suit No. 64/2021 | District Munsif, Eraniel | Date: 03.02.2026 These are cross-examination proceedings (witness statements) in property dispute cases involving alleged forged/irregular documents and boundary/easement issues. The court recorded the testimony of defendants (DW1) regarding disputed land documents, property transfers dating back 45 years, and claims of path obstruction. The order appears to be a recording of witness examination proceedings rather than a final judgment; no conclusive order (judgment/decree) has been pronounced yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case