P. Yesudhas vs A.Jayaseelan Advocate - T. JOHN PUSHPA DHAS — 99/2023

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKK150012642023

Evidence

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

301/2023

Filing Date

07-09-2023

Registration No

99/2023

Registration Date

07-09-2023

Court

Sub Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 26
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section P. YesudhasA.Jayaseelan
Ia/3/2026 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section P. YesudhasA.Jayaseelan
Ia/4/2026 Classification : Recall Petition Section P. YesudhasA.Jayaseelan

Petitioner(s)

P. Yesudhas

Adv. M. PARAMESWARAN

Respondent(s)

A.Jayaseelan Advocate - T. JOHN PUSHPA DHAS

Lilly Gladisa

Adv. T. JOHN PUSHPA DHAS

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge

18-04-2026

Evidence

01-04-2026

Evidence

23-03-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

07-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

28-07-2025
Evidence
12-01-2026
Evidence
12-01-2026
Evidence
29-10-2025
Deposition
02-02-2026
Evidence
07-03-2026
Deposition

Summary: In O.S. No.99/2023 before the Subordinate Judge, Eraniel, the deposition of witness PW1 (Sri Esthasan) was recorded on 07.03.2026 under oath as per the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness testified in open court and various documentary evidence including settlement deed (dated 20.05.2020), petitions, counter-petitions, and FIR copies were marked as exhibits. The witness's testimony was transcribed, read over to him, and he acknowledged it as correct by affixing his signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.S. No.99/2023 before the Subordinate Judge, Eraniel, the deposition of witness PW1 (Sri Esthasan) was recorded on 07.03.2026 under oath as per the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness testified in open court and various documentary evidence including settlement deed (dated 20.05.2020), petitions, counter-petitions, and FIR copies were marked as exhibits. The witness's testimony was transcribed, read over to him, and he acknowledged it as correct by affixing his signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Eraniel All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case