Mitheenkan vs C.Kumaresan and 5 others Advocate - T. SANTHOSH KUMAR, Adv.C.Johnson — 113/2021

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 26. Status: Stay. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKK150006322021

Stay

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

282/2021

Filing Date

26-10-2021

Registration No

113/2021

Registration Date

02-12-2021

Court

Sub Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Mitheenkan

Adv. EBENEZER A

Respondent(s)

C.Kumaresan and 5 others Advocate - T. SANTHOSH KUMAR, Adv.C.Johnson

Er.Monikandan B.E.@ Mr. P.Vaikundmani B.E.

Adv. T. SANTHOSH KUMAR

The Junior Engineer, TMEB, Manavalakurichi Rep by Er.C.Kumarasen B.E.

Adv. T. SANTHOSH KUMAR

The Assistant Executive ngineer, Tamil Nadu, Electicity Board,Thingal Nagar Rep by Er.Monikandan B.E

Adv. T. SANTHOSH KUMAR

The Suprintending Engineer,Tamil Nadu Elecricity Board, Parvathipuram

Adv. T. SANTHOSH KUMAR

The Tamil Nadu Electicity Board, Rep by the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Govt.,Chennai

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge

18-04-2026

Stay

30-03-2026

Stay

11-03-2026

Stay

18-02-2026

Stay

19-01-2026

Stay

Interim Orders

02-09-2022
Evidence
10-10-2022
Evidence
09-11-2022
Evidence
23-11-2022
Evidence
15-12-2022
Evidence
04-01-2023
Evidence
12-01-2023
Evidence
01-02-2023
Evidence
09-02-2023
Evidence
16-02-2023
Evidence
23-02-2023
Evidence
13-04-2023
Deposition
20-04-2023
Deposition
01-06-2023
Deposition
06-07-2023
Deposition
06-07-2023
Deposition
17-04-2024
Copy of Judgment

Summary Petition Dismissed with Costs. The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in a defamation suit against government officials was dismissed because it was filed at the argument stage—after trial commencement and completion of all evidence—without demonstrating due diligence or explaining why the material facts could not have been included in the original plaint or before trial commenced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Petition Dismissed with Costs. The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in a defamation suit against government officials was dismissed because it was filed at the argument stage—after trial commencement and completion of all evidence—without demonstrating due diligence or explaining why the material facts could not have been included in the original plaint or before trial commenced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Eraniel All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case