Narayanakrishnan vs Arivazhagan Advocate - Adv U.A.Perumal — 81/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKK150005932024

Evidence

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

Filing Number

224/2024

Filing Date

19-10-2024

Registration No

81/2024

Registration Date

29-10-2024

Court

Sub Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Narayanakrishnan

Adv. P.V. SURESH

Respondent(s)

Arivazhagan Advocate - Adv U.A.Perumal

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge

20-04-2026

Evidence

06-04-2026

Evidence

25-03-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

23-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

04-02-2026
Evidence
11-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Court: Sub Court, Eraniel Case No.: O.S. No. 81/2024 Date: 11.03.2026 In this civil suit, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of PW1 (Thirunarayanan Krishnan) under oath regarding an alleged agreement where the defendant promised to secure a government job for the plaintiff's son through TNPSC in exchange for ₹10,00,000. The plaintiff claimed the defendant, along with two retired police officers (Rathindas and Ayyasamy), deceived him and misappropriated the funds sent in installments. The court completed the plaintiff's testimony and cross-examination by the defendant's counsel has been deferred to the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court: Sub Court, Eraniel Case No.: O.S. No. 81/2024 Date: 11.03.2026 In this civil suit, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of PW1 (Thirunarayanan Krishnan) under oath regarding an alleged agreement where the defendant promised to secure a government job for the plaintiff's son through TNPSC in exchange for ₹10,00,000. The plaintiff claimed the defendant, along with two retired police officers (Rathindas and Ayyasamy), deceived him and misappropriated the funds sent in installments. The court completed the plaintiff's testimony and cross-examination by the defendant's counsel has been deferred to the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Eraniel All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case