M.Arul John vs G.Joseph Arulraj and 3 others — 29/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKK150004132023

Evidence

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

67/2023

Filing Date

23-02-2023

Registration No

29/2023

Registration Date

23-02-2023

Court

Sub Court, Eraniel

Judge

1-Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Ia/10/2025 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section M.Arul JohnJesintha Mary

Petitioner(s)

M.Arul John

Adv. C.S. LENIN

Respondent(s)

G.Joseph Arulraj and 3 others

Jesintha Mary

Juliet Mary

Adv. L.Rajathurai

A.Alwin Xavier

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge

18-04-2026

Evidence

01-04-2026

Evidence

23-03-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

02-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

07-07-2025
Evidence
11-08-2025
Evidence
15-09-2025
Evidence
06-10-2025
Evidence
12-01-2026
Deposition
18-02-2026
Deposition
23-03-2026
Deposition

This is a civil suit (O.S. No.29/2023) from Sub Court, Eraniel dated 23.03.2026 concerning a property dispute. The document records the cross-examination of Defendant 1 (Smt. Vasantham) regarding land partition and property boundaries, where she testified under oath about the division of 5.50 acres among family members and disputed claims about structures on the property. The case involves examination of conflicting accounts regarding property documents, land measurements (12.700 cents vs. other measurements), and allegations of fraudulent property deeds, with the court hearing evidence from the defendant witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil suit (O.S. No.29/2023) from Sub Court, Eraniel dated 23.03.2026 concerning a property dispute. The document records the cross-examination of Defendant 1 (Smt. Vasantham) regarding land partition and property boundaries, where she testified under oath about the division of 5.50 acres among family members and disputed claims about structures on the property. The case involves examination of conflicting accounts regarding property documents, land measurements (12.700 cents vs. other measurements), and allegations of fraudulent property deeds, with the court hearing evidence from the defendant witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Eraniel All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case