Jemila vs Edwin Raja Sekar Advocate - A. VIMALAN — 11/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK150001752024
Filing Number
27/2024
Filing Date
12-Feb-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
12-Feb-2024
Court
Sub Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jemila
Adv. T. JOHN PUSHPA DHAS
-
2.Suresh
Respondent(s)
-
1.Edwin Raja Sekar Advocate - A. VIMALAN
-
2.Joseph Gnana Sekar
-
3.Stepen Sundara Raj
Adv. G. Eric Marshan
-
4.Mary Vinitha
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
The court examined the witness (Plaintiff 1 - Thirumathai Jeenila) and found multiple inconsistencies in her testimony regarding a property dispute involving a house valued at approximately ₹15,00,000. The court rejected her claims that Defendants 2 and 4 had no involvement in the property's development and found her account unreliable due to contradictions about the property's ownership, construction timeline, and her own actions. The case appears to be adjourned for further proceedings to address the evidential discrepancies and determine the rightful ownership of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Fair JudgmentView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
02-Apr-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
03-Mar-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
07-Feb-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Mediation
Sub Judge
-
06-Jan-2025
Mediation
Sub Judge
-
25-Nov-2024
Mediation
Sub Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
11-Nov-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
11-Nov-2024
Copy of DecreeView PDF
-
11-Nov-2024
Copy of DecreeView PDF
-
11-Nov-2024
Trial
Sub Judge
-
05-Nov-2024
Trial
Sub Judge
-
04-Nov-2024
Trial
Sub Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Trial
Sub Judge
-
15-Oct-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
01-Oct-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
24-Sep-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
12-Sep-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
10-Sep-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
17-Aug-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
08-Aug-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
23-Jul-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
10-Jul-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
03-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
12-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
29-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
15-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
25-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
11-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
12-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2024
The court examined the witness (Plaintiff 1 - Thirumathai Jeenila) and found multiple inconsistencies in her testimony regarding a property dispute involving a house valued at approximately ₹15,00,000. The court rejected her claims that Defendants 2 and 4 had no involvement in the property's development and found her account unreliable due to contradictions about the property's ownership, construction timeline, and her own actions. The case appears to be adjourned for further proceedings to address the evidential discrepancies and determine the rightful ownership of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts