Jemila vs Edwin Raja Sekar Advocate - A. VIMALAN — 11/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK150001752024
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
27/2024
Filing Date
12-02-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
12-02-2024
Court
Sub Court, Eraniel
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jemila
Adv. T. JOHN PUSHPA DHAS
Suresh
Respondent(s)
Edwin Raja Sekar Advocate - A. VIMALAN
Joseph Gnana Sekar
Stepen Sundara Raj
Adv. G. Eric Marshan
Mary Vinitha
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The court examined the witness (Plaintiff 1 - Thirumathai Jeenila) and found multiple inconsistencies in her testimony regarding a property dispute involving a house valued at approximately ₹15,00,000. The court rejected her claims that Defendants 2 and 4 had no involvement in the property's development and found her account unreliable due to contradictions about the property's ownership, construction timeline, and her own actions. The case appears to be adjourned for further proceedings to address the evidential discrepancies and determine the rightful ownership of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court examined the witness (Plaintiff 1 - Thirumathai Jeenila) and found multiple inconsistencies in her testimony regarding a property dispute involving a house valued at approximately ₹15,00,000. The court rejected her claims that Defendants 2 and 4 had no involvement in the property's development and found her account unreliable due to contradictions about the property's ownership, construction timeline, and her own actions. The case appears to be adjourned for further proceedings to address the evidential discrepancies and determine the rightful ownership of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts