Suseela Bai vs John Rose Advocate - Adv.C.Vijayakumar — 200147/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK080002222018
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
156/2018
Filing Date
12-10-2018
Registration No
200147/2018
Registration Date
12-10-2018
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suseela Bai
Adv. Adv T. Rajaiyan, 643/88
Respondent(s)
John Rose Advocate - Adv.C.Vijayakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Batta
Batta
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 08-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 28-03-2026 | Batta |
| 18-03-2026 | Batta |
| 11-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a cross-examination order in O.S. No. 147/2018 from the Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram (dated 20.11.2025). The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of Defendant (D.W.1) regarding disputes over wall construction, police protection orders, and contempt of court petitions filed against police officials. The order documents the defendant's responses to various allegations including attempted obstruction of a public pathway, filing of false complaints against village residents, and claims of harassment related to a land/boundary dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a cross-examination order in O.S. No. 147/2018 from the Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram (dated 20.11.2025). The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of Defendant (D.W.1) regarding disputes over wall construction, police protection orders, and contempt of court petitions filed against police officials. The order documents the defendant's responses to various allegations including attempted obstruction of a public pathway, filing of false complaints against village residents, and claims of harassment related to a land/boundary dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts