P.Suseela vs Viji Advocate - Adv P.Brightwin Xavier — 113/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK080001982023
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
260/2023
Filing Date
03-10-2023
Registration No
113/2023
Registration Date
03-10-2023
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Suseela
Adv. Adv.Padmanabhan.D.N.
S. Ajitha
S.Jenitha
Respondent(s)
Viji Advocate - Adv P.Brightwin Xavier
Vijayakumar
Adv. Adv P.Brightwin Xavier
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 15-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 02-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 24-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No. 113/2023 before the Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram (dated 25.02.2026), the court dismissed the plaintiff's suit regarding disputed property ownership. The court found that necessary parties (the three children of the deceased property owner) were not impleaded as defendants, making the suit defective and incapable of adjudication. The court ruled no relief could be granted and dismissed the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No. 113/2023 before the Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram (dated 25.02.2026), the court dismissed the plaintiff's suit regarding disputed property ownership. The court found that necessary parties (the three children of the deceased property owner) were not impleaded as defendants, making the suit defective and incapable of adjudication. The court ruled no relief could be granted and dismissed the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts