Annal Josephine vs M. Agnes Janet Advocate - Adv.A.P.Rajan — 300076/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNKK080001012017

Arguments

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

Filing Number

63/2017

Filing Date

01-06-2017

Registration No

300076/2017

Registration Date

01-06-2017

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram

Judge

3-Additional District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Annal Josephine

Adv. Adv.S. Rajasekhar

Respondent(s)

M. Agnes Janet Advocate - Adv.A.P.Rajan

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional District Munsif

27-04-2026

Arguments

08-04-2026

Evidence

26-03-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Issue of Service

24-02-2026

Issue of Service

Interim Orders

29-10-2021
Deposition
19-01-2023
Evidence
22-06-2023
Deposition
28-11-2023
Evidence
11-01-2024
Deposition
26-03-2024
Evidence
05-11-2024
Evidence
20-11-2024
Deposition
08-04-2025
Evidence
08-04-2025
Deposition
26-03-2026
Deposition
27-04-2026
Deposition

The court found that the plaintiff lacks adequate access to the disputed property (Survey No. 663/7, Midalam village, 8.8918 cents) as the proposed building blocks the pathway to reach the eastern adjacent property. The court ruled that the plaintiff must create independent access to their property and cannot rely on the panchayat or defendant to provide a pathway. The petition is dismissed as the plaintiff failed to establish proper access rights to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found that the plaintiff lacks adequate access to the disputed property (Survey No. 663/7, Midalam village, 8.8918 cents) as the proposed building blocks the pathway to reach the eastern adjacent property. The court ruled that the plaintiff must create independent access to their property and cannot rely on the panchayat or defendant to provide a pathway. The petition is dismissed as the plaintiff failed to establish proper access rights to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case