Abiraham Thobiyas vs Vinu Kumar — 88/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 25th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKK080000962024

Case disposed

Filing Number

111/2024

Filing Date

07-06-2024

Registration No

88/2024

Registration Date

19-09-2024

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram

Judge

3-Additional District Munsif

Decision Date

25th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Abiraham Thobiyas

Adv. P. Johnsilin Saviourraj

Respondent(s)

Vinu Kumar

parameswari

Adv. Adv. Sundar R. Sajeev

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional District Munsif

25-04-2026

Disposed

18-04-2026

Judgement

17-04-2026

Judgement

08-04-2026

Judgement

24-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

25-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract, having issued a legal notice 20 months after the agreement date and 9 months after the contractual deadline. Additionally, the court determined the agreement was primarily for a loan transaction (Rs. 90,000) rather than a genuine property sale, and rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's fraudulent insertion of alternative relief claims in the pleadings without court authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

06-11-2025
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract, having issued a legal notice 20 months after the agreement date and 9 months after the contractual deadline. Additionally, the court determined the agreement was primarily for a loan transaction (Rs. 90,000) rather than a genuine property sale, and rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's fraudulent insertion of alternative relief claims in the pleadings without court authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case