Abiraham Thobiyas vs Vinu Kumar — 88/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 25th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK080000962024
Filing Number
111/2024
Filing Date
07-Jun-2024
Registration No
88/2024
Registration Date
19-Sep-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram
Judge
3-Additional District Munsif
Decision Date
25-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Abiraham Thobiyas
Adv. P. Johnsilin Saviourraj
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vinu Kumar
-
2.parameswari
Adv. Adv. Sundar R. Sajeev
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract, having issued a legal notice 20 months after the agreement date and 9 months after the contractual deadline. Additionally, the court determined the agreement was primarily for a loan transaction (Rs. 90,000) rather than a genuine property sale, and rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's fraudulent insertion of alternative relief claims in the pleadings without court authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional District Munsif
-
18-Apr-2026
Judgement
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Apr-2026
Judgement
Additional District Munsif
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgement
Additional District Munsif
-
24-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
03-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
06-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Aug-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Jul-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif
-
03-Jul-2025
Issues
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Jun-2025
Await Reports
Additional District Munsif
-
23-Apr-2025
Await Reports
Additional District Munsif
-
25-Mar-2025
Mediation
Additional District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
27-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
21-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif
-
19-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 88/2024
Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract, having issued a legal notice 20 months after the agreement date and 9 months after the contractual deadline. Additionally, the court determined the agreement was primarily for a loan transaction (Rs. 90,000) rather than a genuine property sale, and rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's fraudulent insertion of alternative relief claims in the pleadings without court authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts