State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Kulasekaram vs Prabhu @ Manikandan Advocate - N.Vijayan — 295/2023
Case under Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 Section 3. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNKK070009232023
Filing Number
228/2023
Filing Date
10-10-2023
Registration No
295/2023
Registration Date
10-10-2023
Court
Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
62
Police Station
Kulasekaram P.S
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Kulasekaram
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Prabhu @ Manikandan Advocate - N.Vijayan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 18-02-2026 | Questioning |
| 28-01-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 10-12-2025 | Service Pending-Summon |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Padmanabhapuram Sub Court acquitted the accused (Prabu alias Manikandan) of charges under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Public Property Act, 1992. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused threw a stone at a government bus on April 5, 2023, causing ₹7,000 in damage. Key witnesses, including the bus driver and conductor, could not positively identify the accused, and no direct evidence linked him to the incident. The accused was discharged under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Padmanabhapuram Sub Court acquitted the accused (Prabu alias Manikandan) of charges under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Public Property Act, 1992. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused threw a stone at a government bus on April 5, 2023, causing ₹7,000 in damage. Key witnesses, including the bus driver and conductor, could not positively identify the accused, and no direct evidence linked him to the incident. The accused was discharged under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts