State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Thiruvattar vs Raveendran Nair Advocate - M. Vijayakumar — 270/2023

Case under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 Section 3(1),4(2),(c),5(1),(a),5(1)(d). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNKK070008082023

Filing Number

182/2023

Filing Date

12-Sep-2023

Registration No

270/2023

Registration Date

05-Oct-2023

Court

Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

138

Police Station

Thiruvattar P.S

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 Section 3(1),4(2),(c),5(1),(a),5(1)(d)
Indian Penal Code Section 370(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Thiruvattar

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raveendran Nair Advocate - M. Vijayakumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Sub Court of Padmanabhapuram acquitted the 63-year-old accused, Ravindran Nair, of charges under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 (Sections 3(1), 4(2)(c), and 5(1)(d)), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that procedural violations in the raid (conducted without proper authorization and without following mandatory procedures under Sections 14-15 of the Act) and the absence of testimony from the alleged victims compromised the case, leading to the accused's acquittal under Criminal Procedure Code Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Questioning

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Questioning

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 04-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 21-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 21-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 09-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 07-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 05-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 20-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 03-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 12-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 05-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 22-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 22-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 03-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 16-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 25-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 23-Apr-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 19-Mar-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 18-Dec-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 18-Sep-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 03-Jul-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 27-Mar-2024

    For further Proceedings

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 06-Dec-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 05-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 12-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 270/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Sub Court of Padmanabhapuram acquitted the 63-year-old accused, Ravindran Nair, of charges under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 (Sections 3(1), 4(2)(c), and 5(1)(d)), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that procedural violations in the raid (conducted without proper authorization and without following mandatory procedures under Sections 14-15 of the Act) and the absence of testimony from the alleged victims compromised the case, leading to the accused's acquittal under Criminal Procedure Code Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case