State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of PoliceThuckalay vs Manikandan — 101/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/S,311crpc. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK070007312025

Filing Number

115/2025

Filing Date

26-Nov-2025

Registration No

101/2025

Registration Date

26-Nov-2025

Court

Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/S,311crpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of PoliceThuckalay

    Adv. Adv.T. Michael Ratheesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manikandan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court allowed the petitioner's criminal miscellaneous petition seeking permission to cross-examine a doctor (Dr. Anver Sadiq) as a new witness under Section 311 CrPC in an ongoing investigation case. The court found that examining this witness would not cause irreparable harm to the respondent but denying the petition would prejudice the petitioner/state, hence permitting the examination was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 26-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petitioner's criminal miscellaneous petition seeking permission to cross-examine a doctor (Dr. Anver Sadiq) as a new witness under Section 311 CrPC in an ongoing investigation case. The court found that examining this witness would not cause irreparable harm to the respondent but denying the petition would prejudice the petitioner/state, hence permitting the examination was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case