State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police Thuckalay vs Sajeevan Raj Advocate - M. Vijayakumar — 160/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),332,427,307. Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNKK070004822024
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
139/2024
Filing Date
03-06-2024
Registration No
160/2024
Registration Date
18-06-2024
Court
Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police Thuckalay
Respondent(s)
Sajeevan Raj Advocate - M. Vijayakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 15-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 01-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 11-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 18-02-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Interim Orders
The Subordinate Court of Padmanabhapuram recorded the deposition of P.W. 11 (a police officer) on 29.04.2026 in Case No. SC.160/2024 involving charges under IPC sections 294(B), 332, 427, and 307. The accused was not produced due to jail authority issues, but the defense counsel raised no objection to examining the witness in the accused's absence, and cross-examination was completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Subordinate Court of Padmanabhapuram recorded the deposition of P.W. 11 (a police officer) on 29.04.2026 in Case No. SC.160/2024 involving charges under IPC sections 294(B), 332, 427, and 307. The accused was not produced due to jail authority issues, but the defense counsel raised no objection to examining the witness in the accused's absence, and cross-examination was completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts