State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Thiruvattar vs Sujin Advocate - Adv.Vijaya Kumar.M. — 138/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 332, 323, 307, 506(ii). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNKK070002992021

Filing Number

15/2021

Filing Date

29-Sep-2021

Registration No

138/2021

Registration Date

29-Sep-2021

Court

Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

67

Police Station

Thiruvattar P.S

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 332, 323, 307, 506(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Thiruvattar

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sujin Advocate - Adv.Vijaya Kumar.M.

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    This document is a deposition record of witness P.W. 7 (திரு. ரவீந்திரன்) in case SC. 138/2021 from Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram, dated 28.01.2026. The witness, a retired police inspector, testified about investigating FIR No. 67/2018 under IPC sections 294(B), 332, 323, 307, 506(2) involving vehicle number TN 75 B 1189. During cross-examination, the witness's testimony was heavily challenged, with the defense arguing that the vehicle ownership was unclear, the complainant had no injuries, there was no prior enmity with the accused, and the police investigation lacked credibility. The deposition concluded with the witness maintaining his account but facing significant contradictions regarding evidence collection and the vehicle's connection to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Questioning

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 29-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 24-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 24-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 03-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 03-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 30-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 02-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 02-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 04-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  21. 04-Jun-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 02-Apr-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  23. 02-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 26-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 29-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 21-Dec-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 07-Dec-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 27-Nov-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 23-Oct-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 04-Sep-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 31-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 24-Apr-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 31-Jan-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 08-Nov-2023

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 11-Oct-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 30-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 26-Jul-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 26-Apr-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 15-Feb-2023

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 07-Dec-2022

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 28-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 27-Jul-2022

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  43. 13-Apr-2022

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  44. 30-Mar-2022

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  45. 02-Feb-2022

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  46. 08-Dec-2021

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  47. 08-Nov-2021

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  48. 28-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 29-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2021

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a deposition record of witness P.W. 7 (திரு. ரவீந்திரன்) in case SC. 138/2021 from Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram, dated 28.01.2026. The witness, a retired police inspector, testified about investigating FIR No. 67/2018 under IPC sections 294(B), 332, 323, 307, 506(2) involving vehicle number TN 75 B 1189. During cross-examination, the witness's testimony was heavily challenged, with the defense arguing that the vehicle ownership was unclear, the complainant had no injuries, there was no prior enmity with the accused, and the police investigation lacked credibility. The deposition concluded with the witness maintaining his account but facing significant contradictions regarding evidence collection and the vehicle's connection to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case