State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Thiruvattar vs Jose Advocate - Adv.S. Anto Cletus Raj — 108/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),307,323,506(2). Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNKK070002722024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
95/2024
Filing Date
15-03-2024
Registration No
108/2024
Registration Date
26-03-2024
Court
Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
259
Police Station
Thiruvattar P.S
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,Thiruvattar
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Jose Advocate - Adv.S. Anto Cletus Raj
Subin
Adv. Adv.Vijaya Kumar.M.
Yuujin
Adv. Adv.Vijaya Kumar.M.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 11-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 28-01-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 12-11-2025 | Trial |
| 24-09-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Case No. SC.108/2024 before the Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram (dated 08.04.2026), the court recorded depositions of two prosecution witnesses (P.W. 1 and P.W. 2) relating to an incident on 21.08.2018 involving alleged knife attack injuries. The court allowed petitions filed in both witness depositions, with the accused remaining absent during proceedings. The witnesses provided testimony regarding the alleged assault, and no cross-examination was conducted by the defense counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Case No. SC.108/2024 before the Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram (dated 08.04.2026), the court recorded depositions of two prosecution witnesses (P.W. 1 and P.W. 2) relating to an incident on 21.08.2018 involving alleged knife attack injuries. The court allowed petitions filed in both witness depositions, with the accused remaining absent during proceedings. The witnesses provided testimony regarding the alleged assault, and no cross-examination was conducted by the defense counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts