State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,THUCKALAY vs Satheesh @ Satheesh Kumar Advocate - T. Nelson — 105/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),353,323,506(ii),307, 149. Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 12th August 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNKK070001832023
Next Hearing
12th August 2026
Filing Number
6/2023
Filing Date
24-03-2023
Registration No
105/2023
Registration Date
24-03-2023
Court
Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
1873
Police Station
THUCKALAY P.S
Year
2001
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police,THUCKALAY
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Satheesh @ Satheesh Kumar Advocate - T. Nelson
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 11-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 25-02-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 11-02-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 17-12-2025 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Case No. SC.105/2023 at Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram (dated 10.09.2025), petitions filed by the accused were allowed and admitted. The court recorded depositions of Prosecution Witnesses 4 and 5, who testified regarding an FIR registered on 14.09.2001 under IPC sections 294(b), 353, and 307. The accused was absent during the proceedings, and cross-examination by the defence was conducted on the witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Case No. SC.105/2023 at Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram (dated 10.09.2025), petitions filed by the accused were allowed and admitted. The court recorded depositions of Prosecution Witnesses 4 and 5, who testified regarding an FIR registered on 14.09.2001 under IPC sections 294(b), 353, and 307. The accused was absent during the proceedings, and cross-examination by the defence was conducted on the witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts