Manappuram Finance Ltd Rep By Its Ara Manager Authorized Rep By Rakesh Veerapur vs Benjamin Ruban — 150/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section UNDER ORDER XXI RULE 54 & 66, 72 AND SECTION 151 CPC. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED WITHOUT COSTS on 15th May 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNKK050002612025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-02-2024

Filing Number

192/2025

Filing Date

02-03-2024

Registration No

150/2025

Registration Date

31-12-2025

Court

Special Sub Court to deal with forest offence cases, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Special Judge for Forest Offence Cases

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED WITHOUT COSTS

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section UNDER ORDER XXI RULE 54 & 66, 72 AND SECTION 151 CPC

Petitioner(s)

Manappuram Finance Ltd Rep By Its Ara Manager Authorized Rep By Rakesh Veerapur

Adv. G Veludhas

Respondent(s)

Benjamin Ruban

Guriz Michael

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Special Judge for Forest Offence Cases

15-05-2026

Disposed

30-04-2026

Orders

15-04-2026

ENQUIRY

26-03-2026

ENQUIRY

11-03-2026

ENQUIRY

Final Orders / Judgements

15-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court dismissed Manappuram Finance Ltd.'s execution petition seeking to recover Rs. 5,58,255 from the respondents based on an arbitral award. The court found the underlying arbitral award void because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally by the petitioner without the respondent's consent or knowledge, violating Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act, and the award was passed ex parte without affording natural justice to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Manappuram Finance Ltd.'s execution petition seeking to recover Rs. 5,58,255 from the respondents based on an arbitral award. The court found the underlying arbitral award void because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally by the petitioner without the respondent's consent or knowledge, violating Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act, and the award was passed ex parte without affording natural justice to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Special Sub Court to deal with forest offence cases, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case