K . Venkatsh vs Krishna Pillai 3 ors — 209/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKK040004382022

IA Pending

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

Filing Number

518/2022

Filing Date

28-11-2022

Registration No

209/2022

Registration Date

05-12-2022

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

6-Principal District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1
Ia/5/2026 Classification : Petition to Set-aside Exparte Order or Decree Section K . Venkatsh

Petitioner(s)

K . Venkatsh

Adv. Adv M.Padmasenan

Respondent(s)

Krishna Pillai 3 ors

Malathi Maheswari

Umadevi

Venilla

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif

30-04-2026

IA Pending

21-04-2026

IA Pending

02-04-2026

IA Pending

24-03-2026

IA Pending

11-03-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

05-06-2023
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The petition for interim injunction filed by K. Venkatesh was dismissed by the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil on June 5, 2023. The court found that the petitioner's claims were internally inconsistent—simultaneously asserting the property was purchased by Nagammal while also claiming it was ancestral property—and therefore failed to establish a prima facie case. The court also noted unclear inheritance claims since the petitioner's father (1st Defendant) was alive, making the petitioner ineligible for interim injunction regarding the ancestral property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition for interim injunction filed by K. Venkatesh was dismissed by the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil on June 5, 2023. The court found that the petitioner's claims were internally inconsistent—simultaneously asserting the property was purchased by Nagammal while also claiming it was ancestral property—and therefore failed to establish a prima facie case. The court also noted unclear inheritance claims since the petitioner's father (1st Defendant) was alive, making the petitioner ineligible for interim injunction regarding the ancestral property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case