Raja Singh vs Raja Thangam and 8 others Advocate - Adv SA.Kanagasabapathi — 195/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK040003662022
Filing Number
459/2022
Filing Date
07-11-2022
Registration No
195/2022
Registration Date
11-11-2022
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raja Singh
Adv. Adv S.Athilingam
Respondent(s)
Raja Thangam and 8 others Advocate - Adv SA.Kanagasabapathi
Raja Chinnam
Thangathurai
Jagatpathy
Subhaseethapathy
Shanmugapathy
Raja Sekar
Raja geetha
Raja lakshmi
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Enquiry
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 02-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 23-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 20-02-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Principal District Munsif at Nagercoil dismissed the plaintiff's partition suit on March 16, 2026, holding that the property was self-acquired by deceased Rajalakshmi and devolved only to her direct heirs (husband and three children), not to the plaintiff from her husband's second marriage. The court found that a 1982 release deed conclusively established the three children as sole beneficiaries, and the plaintiff's father abandoned any claim for over 50 years, making him ineligible to claim partition. The plaintiff was ordered to pay costs to defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Principal District Munsif at Nagercoil dismissed the plaintiff's partition suit on March 16, 2026, holding that the property was self-acquired by deceased Rajalakshmi and devolved only to her direct heirs (husband and three children), not to the plaintiff from her husband's second marriage. The court found that a 1982 release deed conclusively established the three children as sole beneficiaries, and the plaintiff's father abandoned any claim for over 50 years, making him ineligible to claim partition. The plaintiff was ordered to pay costs to defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts