Michael Chandra Sekar vs Edwin Greevin Rajan and 3 others Advocate - Adv Mohamed Farook, Adv Mohamed Farook — 11/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK040003192019
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
435/2019
Filing Date
06-11-2019
Registration No
11/2020
Registration Date
11-01-2020
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
8-II Additional District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Michael Chandra Sekar
Adv. Adv C. Ashok Kumar
Respondent(s)
Edwin Greevin Rajan and 3 others Advocate - Adv Mohamed Farook, Adv Mohamed Farook
Michael Vency Vijay
Adv. Adv E.V.N.Valiaperumal
The Azhappapuram Town Panchayat
Adv. Government Pleader
Julian cyril
Hearing History
Judge: 8-II Additional District Munsif
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 15-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 10-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 09-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 06-04-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The II Additional District Munsif Court at Nagercoil allowed the petition (I.A. No.5 of 2025) permitting the plaintiff to amend the property schedule in the original suit from Re.Sy.No.388/8B to the correct property designation Re.Sy.No.148/1B. The court found the incorrect property number was a mere typographical error that caused no prejudice to the respondents and was necessary for proper adjudication of the suit for demarcation and injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The II Additional District Munsif Court at Nagercoil allowed the petition (I.A. No.5 of 2025) permitting the plaintiff to amend the property schedule in the original suit from Re.Sy.No.388/8B to the correct property designation Re.Sy.No.148/1B. The court found the incorrect property number was a mere typographical error that caused no prejudice to the respondents and was necessary for proper adjudication of the suit for demarcation and injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts