Ramachandran vs Anna Thangam Advocate - Adv V.Purhshothaman — 157/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, order VII, Rule 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK040002882023
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
346/2023
Filing Date
14-09-2023
Registration No
157/2023
Registration Date
16-09-2023
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramachandran
Adv. Adv A.Kanakamani Raj
Respondent(s)
Anna Thangam Advocate - Adv V.Purhshothaman
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This document is a civil suit (O.S. No. 157/2023) heard in a Tamil Nadu district court on 20.11.2025 involving a property dispute between family members regarding land allocation. The plaintiff contests the defendant's claims about jointly held property and inheritance matters, arguing that the settled plot allocations and documentary evidence support his position, while disputing various allegations about unauthorized appropriation and misrepresentation of property boundaries. The court's detailed examination of witness testimony and settlement documents suggests the case remains under consideration with no final judgment yet rendered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a civil suit (O.S. No. 157/2023) heard in a Tamil Nadu district court on 20.11.2025 involving a property dispute between family members regarding land allocation. The plaintiff contests the defendant's claims about jointly held property and inheritance matters, arguing that the settled plot allocations and documentary evidence support his position, while disputing various allegations about unauthorized appropriation and misrepresentation of property boundaries. The court's detailed examination of witness testimony and settlement documents suggests the case remains under consideration with no final judgment yet rendered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts